A decade following the UK stumbled into a hurried referendum that divided the country and unleashed turmoil, a warning is issued from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.
The government and voters sleepwalked into Brexit and the same might transpire with a national vote on a unified Ireland, initiating convulsions for which nobody is equipped.
That represents the warning from two respected journalists from each side of the Irish border who have teamed up to analyse the pros and cons of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to establish a new state with the Republic of Ireland.
Governmental Structures Unprepared
The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are gravely ill-prepared for a potentially contentious and seismic public vote.
"The crucial insight of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can build support very quickly," O’Toole said. "I would suggest that the institutional structure of our region remains highly fragile."
New Title Aims to Provoke Discussion
The pair have examined the political, economic and cultural rationales for any structural alteration in a volume, Examining Irish Unification, released by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.
They aim to stir debate on the topic with a roadshow of public talks that will bring them to Westminster soon.
"What troubles all parties, or ought to concern every person, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," stated O’Toole.
"We should prevent a national vote on a thumbs up-thumbs down, ambiguous question whose implications have not been clarified because then you find yourself with an extraordinarily split population where the losing side are resistant to defeat and the those successful are uncertain quite what it is that they have gained."
Constitutional Provision
Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland government minister must arrange a public vote on Irish unity if it appears likely that a most voters would support.
Nationalist parties and other nationalists say that moment is approaching, and a group named pro-unification advocates has garnered backing, but both governments and pro-UK factions downplay the likelihood, resulting in ambiguity if and when there could be a referendum.
Insufficient Informed Dialogue
Partisan language supporting and opposing unity has obscured the absence of informed dialogue, stated McBride.
"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the concept but the detailed consideration which may surpass that to make it possible hasn't for the most part happened. Much has gone on in scholarly circles but hardly any elected officials or advocates are willing to participate with even the basics. To illustrate, what sort of state might be preferred? Centralised? Decentralised?"
Book's Approach
In the publication, none of the commentators advocates unity or the current situation. They composes two articles that strive for objectivity in detailing the rationale for a unified Ireland and the case opposing it, assembling economic and societal statistics, previous instances and structural examples.
Debates encompass identity markers, taxes, medical care, retirement funds, public liabilities and the risk of unionist unrest. The aim is to educate and encourage discussion.
"Considerable attention exists in the subject but there hasn't quite been a discussion," commented O’Toole. "Debate implies an acceptance of the concept that there could be valid points on either side."
Simultaneous Plebiscites
A referendum in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens claim they favour unity but refuse greater financial contributions or introducing a different emblem to reflect pro-UK communities' British culture.
"The Irish government does need to determine what the offer from nationalist groups is other than just saying: 'We want a united Ireland and we value you'," said the commentator.
Possibility of Referendum
McBride thinks a national vote in his lifetime is possible and that it could happen unexpectedly. "It is possible just a reckless or a ill-advised or a incompetent government minister who states: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"
Both nationalists and unionists have plausible, justified perspectives, he said. "One side will win here and the other side will ultimately be defeated but all factions has possesses valuable insights to gain from the opposing viewpoints."
Call for Wider Dialogue
Westminster should participate in the debate, stated the analyst. "This concerns your state. It's a British issue equally as it is an Irish issue."